Independent matching desk

Advanced solutions, matched to the channel you have

Applications arrive here in quantity, and the pattern in them is the product: which provider actually works for a channel your size, in your country, with your kind of catalogue behind it.

Free for creators. No account, no lock-in.

12,000+ creators matched so far

  • 12,000+

    Applications read

    Every one of them says something about what works for a channel of that shape.

  • 40+

    Providers compared

    Payout rails, distributors, ad partners and networks, held against each other.

  • 90+

    Countries covered

    What clears in a day in one country is dead weight in the next one over.

  • Free

    To the creator

    The desk is paid on the provider’s side of the match, never on yours.

About

A desk, not another provider

ChannelScale Partners does not move money, distribute catalogues or sell ad inventory. It does one thing: work out which provider should be doing those for a particular channel, and hand that channel over with the terms already on the table. Nothing is white-labelled here — the provider you end up with is the provider you deal with.

That judgement is not an opinion, it is volume. Applications arrive here in quantity, and the same questions repeat with the country, the audience size and the kind of catalogue behind the channel. Which rail clears quickly where you live, which distributor is worth the cut at your size, who actually answers on a weekend — the pattern is only visible from a distance, and this desk stands at that distance.

  • Compare
  • Shortlist
  • Introduce
  • 01

    One application

    • Country
    • Audience
    • Catalogue
    • Payout route

    Your setup is written down once, not pitched to nine sales teams

  • 02

    Every provider

    • Rates
    • Payout speed
    • Coverage
    • Support

    Compared on the terms that decide your case, not on the deck

  • 03

    No cost to you

    • No fee
    • No lock-in
    • No account

    The desk is paid on the other side of the match

What gets matched

Everything a provider can switch on,
and nothing you have to take

Nine things are worth comparing between providers. Most channels need two of them, and finding out which two is the entire job.

Payouts

Payout routing

Earnings leave in the currency you actually spend, by whichever rail clears where you live. The right answer is different in Warsaw and in Lagos.

Timing

Early payouts

The wait between earning and holding the money is a platform default, not a law. Some providers shorten it; the cut they take for that is the thing to compare.

Planning

Advances

The expensive month rarely lines up with the paying month. Income that has not arrived yet can cover the gap — on terms that vary wildly between desks.

Speed

Instant transfers

Express payouts for the days the money was needed yesterday. Worth having, rarely worth paying for twice.

Accounts

Business accounts

Account details of your own for receiving and moving money — the point at which a channel stops being a hobby on paper.

Catalogue

Catalogue distribution

One upload puts a catalogue everywhere it can earn, and audio that travels keeps paying on short-form long after the release week.

Games

In-platform games

Playable formats published inside the video platforms themselves, in front of an audience that is already sitting there.

Web

Web monetisation

Sites and apps reach premium ad inventory through an intermediary’s stack. Which intermediary decides what the same traffic is worth.

Brands

Brand collaborations

Campaigns, creator search and the payments that follow, on one platform instead of five spreadsheets and a chase-up email.

The shortlist

Forty providers in, two names out

The same four constraints are applied to every candidate, in the same order. Most of them fall at the first one, and the reason each name survived is written next to it.

Compared on

  • Country
  • Audience size
  • Catalogue
  • Payout timing
  • PossibleProvider A58%Local rails clear same dayNothing for the catalogue
  • RecommendedProvider B91%Covers payouts and catalogueAdvance terms are the market average
  • Ruled outProvider C24%Cheapest early payouts on the listNo working rail to your country

What comes back

  • Two names
  • the reasons
  • and an
  • introduction

What comes back is short on purpose: the providers that survived your four constraints, what each of them is bad at, and the one worth starting with. Staying where you are counts as an answer.

How it works

From one email to the provider that fits

  1. 01

    Send the setup over

    At the bottom of this page: a name, an address and a link. If it is easier to describe the situation in your own words, the email next to the form reaches exactly the same desk.

    • A link and a rough sense of the size is enough to start
    • Replies are written by a person, not by a ticket queue
    • Nothing is signed at this stage, and nothing is forwarded yet
    What it takes
    Three fields
    Who replies
    A person
  2. 02

    Read it against the market

    Four things decide almost everything: where the money has to land, how much of it there is, what sits next to the channel, and how badly the timing hurts. The rest of a provider’s pitch is noise until those are settled.

    • Which rails clear quickly in your country, and at what cost
    • Whether early payouts or an advance is the cheaper fix
    • What else — catalogue, site, app — is worth monetising at all
    Compared on
    Terms · Coverage · Speed
    Cost of the review
    Nothing
  3. 03

    Get a shortlist

    Not a directory and not a single name presented as destiny. Two or three providers that fit your case, each with the thing it is good at and the thing it is bad at written next to it — including the cases where the honest answer is that your current setup already wins.

    • Every name comes with the reason it is on the list
    • The trade-offs are stated, not buried under a rate table
    • “Stay where you are” is a valid outcome and does get said
    Names on a list
    2–3
    Obligation
    None
  4. 04

    Get handed over

    Once you pick one, the introduction is made with your case already explained, so the first conversation starts past the discovery call. From there the relationship is yours and the provider’s; the desk stays reachable if it goes sideways.

    • Your setup arrives at the provider already written up
    • Terms are discussed before anything is switched on
    • The desk stays reachable after the handover
    Handed to
    One provider
    Paid by
    That provider

Stories

Told by people who were matched

The useful part is rarely the name at the end. It is being told which of the things you were worrying about actually mattered in your case.

  • Travel channel340K subscribers
    I shoot in one country and pay rent in another, and every provider I looked at was excellent at the part of that I did not need. Someone finally asked where the money had to land first, and the list got very short after that.
    Payout routing · handed over in a week
  • Music producerCatalogue of 60 tracks
    I expected to be sold something. What I got was two names and the reason each one was on the list, including the bit where the cheaper one would have been worse for a catalogue my size.
    Distribution · shortlist of two
  • Gaming studioFour channels
    We shoot in seasons, so the expensive month is never the month anything pays. The useful part was being told which of the two fixes we were considering was the one that actually applied to us.
    Advances · timing review
  • Tech reviewer610K subscribers
    The answer was that my current setup was already fine and I should change one thing, not everything. It is the first time anyone in this industry has told me to do less.
    Review · no change recommended

FAQ

Asked before the first email

Anything that is not here is a question for a person.

Ready when you are

Tell us what the channel needs. We will say what fits.

Three fields, or a plain email — whichever is less effort. Nothing is signed before the terms are on the table.

Get in touch

Contacts

Write to a person

hello@channelscale-partners.org

A line about the channel and what you want to sort out is enough — the rest is a conversation, not a questionnaire.

Leave your channel instead